On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:24:05AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > Have you tried to pass this param from kernel cmdline? What's the > > syntax if we want to pass a 800 MHz max_freq? > clk-reg-cpufreq.max_freq=800000
Thanks. I was mistaken on the module name. > > ### cpufreq_05: > > ### test 'ondemand' and 'conservative' trigger correctly the configuration > > directory > > ### > > https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpufreq_05 > > ### > > cpufreq_05.0: checking 'ondemand' directory exists... > > pass > > cpufreq_05.1: checking 'conservative' directory exists... > > pass > > cpufreq_05.2: checking 'ondemand' directory is not there... > > pass > > cpufreq_05.3: checking 'conservative' directory is not there... > > pass > > cpufreq_05.4: checking 'ondemand' directory exists... > > fail > > cpufreq_05.5: checking 'conservative' directory exists... > > pass > I past fail part script here: > switch_ondemand cpu0 > switch_conservative cpu1 > check "'ondemand' directory exists" "test -d $CPU_PATH/cpufreq/ondemand" > check "'conservative' directory exists" "test -d > $CPU_PATH/cpufreq/conservative" > This driver assume all cpu cores to share the same freq and voltage. The > affected > cpu is all other cpus. They also share one single governor. The test case > does not > suit this driver and not for most arm multi-core cpus I guess. Then this is the feedback that Linaro PMWG wants to have, I guess. Here is my tag on this patch. Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org> -- Regards, Shawn _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
