* Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com> [120223 19:29]:
> On Friday 24 February 2012 12:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
> >>@@ -113,5 +113,31 @@
> >> #size-cells =<0>;
> >> ti,hwmods = "i2c3";
> >> };
> >>+
> >>+ mmc1: mmc@1 {
> >>+ compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+ ti,hwmods = "mmc1";
> >>+ ti,dual-volt;
> >>+ };
> >>+
> >>+ mmc2: mmc@2 {
> >>+ compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+ ti,hwmods = "mmc2";
> >>+ };
> >>+
> >>+ mmc3: mmc@3 {
> >>+ compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+ ti,hwmods = "mmc3";
> >>+ };
> >>+
> >>+ mmc4: mmc@4 {
> >>+ compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+ ti,hwmods = "mmc4";
> >>+ };
> >>+
> >>+ mmc5: mmc@5 {
> >>+ compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+ ti,hwmods = "mmc5";
> >>+ };
> >> };
> >> };
> >
> >These all should all be "ti,omap3-hsmmc" I guess?
>
> Well, I defined the binding such that both omap2 and omap3
> can use the same compatible "ti,omap2-hsmmc" since there is
> no difference in the way they are defined or handled. If thats
> confusing, I can have separate compatibles.
> Btw, I guess we do the same with a few other re-used IPs as well,
> I just checked and mcpsi does the same.
Yeah let's use separate compatibles to avoid confusion.
For omap2 we also have the ti,omap2-mmc in addition to
ti,omap2-hsmmc..
Regards,
Tony
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
