On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Robert Lee <rob....@linaro.org> writes: > >> This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform >> cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq >> disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into >> cpuidle_call_idle will have already called local_irq_disable(). >> >> These changes have been pulled into linux-next. >> >> Len, Andrew, can a request be made for Linus to pull these changes? >> >> Acked-by: Jean Pihet<j-pi...@ti.com> (v6) >> Tested-by: Jean Pihet<j-pi...@ti.com> (v6, omap3) >> Tested-by: Amit Daniel<amit.kach...@linaro.org> (v6, Exynos4) >> Tested-by: Robert Lee<rob....@linaro.org> (imx51, imx6q) > > Note that there's a space missing between the name and email in these > tags (and for Deepthi's below also.) That seems to exist in all the > patches. >
Thanks. This is now fixed in my pull tree. >> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> > > For my Reviewed-by, it only applies to the core code and the OMAP > changes. I haven't reviewed the other platform-specific drivers. I > believe the same applies to Jean Pihet who works with me on OMAP. > >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> >> Reviewed-by: Deepthi Dharwar<deep...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (core cpuidle only) > > Looks like you never heard from anyone actively working on at91, > shmobile, kirwood or davinci. > > I'm not sure we should merge those platform-specific changes without an > ack from those platform maintainers. > > For 3.4, maybe we should just merge the core code and the platforms that > have been reviewed/ack'd, and for 3.5, spent some time nagging the other > platform maintainers to review and test. > > Kevin > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
