On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 02:27 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 07:14 +0800, Andy Green wrote:If
>> >> the current one performs best and is on a random HEAD commit, we
>> >> certainly shouldn't wind it backwards to last -rc that performs worse
>> >> just because that's "easier to communicate".
>> >
>> > I agree, I wasn't envisioning winding backwards, more that we stop
>> > winding forwards at a chosen -rc, or stop merging topics on a Friday,
>> > bring the common tree up-to-date with the weekends Torvalds -rc, then
>> > build, test and fix this ready for Linaro RC on the Friday.
>>
>> I think we agree ... here is how I thought so far should linux-linaro
>> could be driven forward:
>>
>>  1. we have an automated -tracking baseline running that always
>> reflects how your topics look like on tip
>>  2. linux-linaro moves forward on the day a new RC comes around.
>>  3. linux-linaro will not wait for topics to be ready before doing the RC 
>> jump
>>  4. in between RCs, we only move mainline on our linux-linaro release
>> baseline forward if we see a working tracking build that wouldn't drop
>> any topics that already made it into this RC cycle.
>
> I'm not sure this differs much from linux-linaro == last good automated
> -tracking baseline, which might be simpler to understand. But I thought
> linux-linaro was meant to be this tracking baseline anyway?
>

It's a good rule of thumb ... however, in order to ensure that we will
not be stuck with non-good builds forever, I was saying that we should
move to next RCs and kill topics until we are good again :), while we
would only move forward in between RCs if we don't need to drop topics
in such a move.

Does that explain the subtle difference better?

-- 
Alexander Sack
Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams
http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to