On 2 May 2012 21:11, Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.l...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Recently a patch went in for tidspbridge code, to ioremap
> SCM registers and solve a build break[1]. However it has
> been pointed out before that this is a layer violation
> given that control module should handle its own registers, this
> series is an attempt to create APIs for the users of these
> registers.
>
> With some adaptations this patch might also make use of it:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg66491.html
>
> Patch: staging: tidspbridge: use scm functions to set boot address and mode,
> will be sent separately to staging tree.
>
> Tested on OMAP3 Beagleboard.
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/devel@linuxdriverproject.org/msg18762.html
>
> Omar Ramirez Luna (3):
>  OMAP2+: control: new APIs to configure boot address and mode
>  OMAP: dsp: interface to control module functions
>  staging: tidspbridge: use scm functions to set boot address and mode

Ping.

It seems that I unconsciously copied the previous concept, recently I
dug this thread to explain the reasoning of these patches:

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg38015.html

These were provided by Paul, one of them acked by Kevin, somehow they
were not included and I forgot about them.

My set also includes OMAP4 check, which I heard recently was tested
with the dsp on pandaboard. If needed I can go back to Paul's version
and re-spin them, with minor changes. Please let me know.

Regards,

Omar

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to