On Friday 14 September 2012, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On 12 September 2012 17:56, Andrey Konovalov
> <andrey.konova...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > The linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) tree has been moved to v3.6-rc5 base.
> > All the topics existed in the 12.08 version of llct have been carried over
> > into the updated tree with few easy to resolve conflicts. The only one which
> > needs attention is due to commit "ASoC: Samsung: Fix build error" [1]. In
> > fact I had to revert it because it doesn't work with the multiplatform topic
> > (the latter renames all the arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach dirs to
> > arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach-<name>). Sachin or Tushar, could you take
> > a look please?
>
> CC'd Arnd.
>
> <mach/dma.h> present in some Samsung driver files esp. related to
> audio haven't been converted to <mach-<name>/dma.h> form mainly
> because most Samsung mach-* directories have a dma.h file and those
> need to be consolidated first. Kukjin's team is working on cleaning
> this up. See the below link
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12049
>
> With the fix patch reverted, you will get build errors if you enable
> pcm. However if you do not intend to enable pcm you may go ahead with
> it. Alternatively, you may replace <mach/dma.h> with
> <mach-exynos/dma.h> for your purpose (stopgap solution).
I think we need to discuss whether the multiplatform branch should still
be included in the linux-linaro-core-tracking tree. At the ARM mini summit
in San Diego, we discussed in length about how we want to get to actual
multiplatform kernels, and decided *not* to use my testing/mach-headers
branch.
We could keep using it for a little longer, but I think eventually
we will have do thing differently as upstream moves on, so we might decide
to remove it right away.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
