On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:05:30AM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Another point to mention, is the proposal to merge the board > enablement topics first, and the generic features next (the LSK > case). This would assume the generic topics to enable their features > for "all the linaro supported" boards, or adding separate topic to > enable the features for particular boards. This also breaks the > current 2-level llct/ll model.
I think if we were doing this (though I do agree with Andy that it's not the ordering I'd expect) we'd want to keep the branches doing the enabling separate - that way people can pick up the generic branches for use in their projects without worrying about dependencies on boards or whatever that they don't care about.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
