On 20 June 2013 22:23, Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Manjunath Goudar wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -686,7 +631,7 @@ ohci_hcd_at91_drv_suspend(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev, pm_message_t mesg)
> > > > * REVISIT: some boards will be able to turn VBUS off...
> > > > */
> > > > if (at91_suspend_entering_slow_clock()) {
> > > > - ohci_usb_reset (ohci);
> > > > + ohci_restart(ohci);
> > >
> > > Why did you change this? Did we discuss it earlier?
> > >
> >
> > We are not discussed regarding this,I think we need to call
> > use ohci_resume() instead of ohci_restart().
>
> Why? Don't you think the current code has a good reason for calling
> ohci_usb_reset()?
>
>
Here ohci_usb_reset() is static function,that is what I am planing to call
ohci_setup() or ohci_restart() because it is calling ohci_usb_reset(),
If not calling, we can make ohci_usb_reset() function as non-static
function
or use directly ohci_usb_reset() function code here.
Let me know which one is good approach.
Alan Stern
>
>
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
