Looping Will... On 29 July 2013 16:28, Dirk Behme <dirk.be...@de.bosch.com> wrote: > On 26.07.2013 15:42, Andy Green wrote: >> >> On 26 July 2013 20:58, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > > ... >>> >>> you not make sure that you provide optimized implementations for such >>> functions and consequently #define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMMOVE (and >>> __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCPY) ? >> >> >> Yes I found these afterwards... performance is slightly better than >> memcpy() thanks to Nicolas Pitre it seems. The U-Boot config for the >> platform we have didn't know about them, it's much better with them. >> >> After I wrote this patch it was also pointed out by Will Newton at >> Linaro that we have Neon accelerated memcpy lying around with BSD >> license.... >> >> https://launchpad.net/cortex-strings >> >> however for my purposes NOR boot is working good enough with the ARCH >> versions. > > > I've had a look to > > https://launchpad.net/cortex-strings > > and there downloaded > > https://launchpad.net/cortex-strings/trunk/2013.01/+download/cortex-strings-1.0-2013.01.tar.bz2 > > (from the green download button on the right side). > > The README mentions > > src/neon contains NEON based routines for AArch32. > > but the cortex-strings-1.0-2013.01.tar.bz2 seems to contain an empty > src/neon directory. Is this intended?
I don't know... I agree that dir is empty... Will, do you know the story? I found nice-looking ones in reference/newlib but I don't think they're NEON. -Andy > Best regards > > Dirk > > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev