On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:59:24PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Christian Robottom Reis <k...@linaro.org> wrote on 09/23/2011 10:00:18 PM: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 06:51:37PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > > * Implemented and tested support for disabling address space > > > randomization in gdbserver; patch posted for review. > > > > I'm not sure this is related, but remember that thread where Russell was > > commenting about a regression in try_to_freeze() he was going to work on > > fixing? I'm curious -- Where did that end up going? > > No, this is not related. In any case, the current status of the signal > handler issue (what the try_to_freeze mail chain was about) is that Russell > said he was going to look into it, but so far nothing has happened (he has > neither reverted my original patch as he said he might do; nor has he come > up with some new patch). > > I guess I could give him a ping, but since he didn't revert my patch after > all, it didn't seem a priority to me ...
Interesting. You could reach out and reping just out of courtesy -- I don't like unfinished business, though code's always unfinished in a way. > [ P.S. Maybe you were also thinking of another kernel bug that *did* affect > disabling address space randomization (LP #616001): this bug has been fixed > upstream by Nicolas a while ago. ] Yeah, that's what triggered my memory access. But I was really asking about the try_to_freeze() thread. -- Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935 Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
