Hi Patrick,

Did you already get any bug reports for gcc-14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72 ?

In our benchmarking we see that 483.xalancbmk (from SPEC CPU2006) fails to 
build on 32-bit ARM.  Let me know if you need any help in reproducing and 
troubleshooting this.

Thanks!

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org

> On Sep 27, 2023, at 11:05, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
> 
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
> patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, 
> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's 
> #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on 
> the usual project channel.
> 
> In CI config tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 after:
> 
>  | commit gcc-14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72
>  | Author: Patrick Palka <ppa...@redhat.com>
>  | Date:   Mon Sep 18 14:47:52 2023 -0400
>  | 
>  |     c++: non-dependent assignment checking [PR63198, PR18474]
>  |     
>  |     This patch makes us recognize and check non-dependent simple assigments
>  |     ahead of time, like we already do for compound assignments.  This means
>  |     the templated representation of such assignments will now usually have
>  |     an implicit INDIRECT_REF (due to the reference return type), which the
>  |     -Wparentheses code needs to handle.  As a drive-by improvement, this
>  | ... 51 lines of the commit log omitted.
> 
> the following benchmarks slowed down by more than 3%:
> - 483.xalancbmk failed to build
> 
> Below reproducer instructions can be used to re-build both "first_bad" and 
> "last_good" cross-toolchains used in this bisection.  Naturally, the scripts 
> will fail when triggerring benchmarking jobs if you don\'t have access to 
> Linaro TCWG CI.
> 
> Configuration:
> - Benchmark: 
> - Toolchain: GCC + Glibc + GNU Linker
> - Version: all components were built from their tip of trunk
> - Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf
> - Compiler flags: O3
> - Hardware: NVidia TK1 4x Cortex-A15
> 
> This benchmarking CI is work-in-progress, and we welcome feedback and 
> suggestions at linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org .  In our improvement plans 
> is to add support for SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks and provide "perf 
> report/annotate" data behind these reports.
> 
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
> 
> Current build   : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6--gnu-arm-master-O3-build/141/artifact/artifacts
> Reference build : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6--gnu-arm-master-O3-build/140/artifact/artifacts
> 
> Reproduce last good and first bad builds: 
> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/6e92a6a2a72d3b7a5e1b29042d8a6a43fe1085aa/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3/reproduction_instructions.txt
> 
> Full commit : 
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/6e92a6a2a72d3b7a5e1b29042d8a6a43fe1085aa
> 
> Latest bug report status : https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-951
> 
> List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
> * tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6
> ** gnu-arm-master-O3
> *** 483.xalancbmk failed to build
> *** 
> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/6e92a6a2a72d3b7a5e1b29042d8a6a43fe1085aa/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3/details.txt
> *** 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6--gnu-arm-master-O3-build/141/


_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to