Hi Jonathan,

It also caused same regression on x86_64:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2023-November/078617.html

Could you help verify that?

Thx,
Haochen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gcc-regression <gcc-regression-
> bounces+haochen.jiang=intel....@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of ci_notify--- via
> Gcc-regression
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 6:31 AM
> To: jwak...@redhat.com
> Cc: ci_not...@linaro.org; gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-5794-g7a6a29c455e: FAIL: 1 regressions on
> aarch64
> 
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
> patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, please
> follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's 
> #linaro-tcwg
> channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual 
> project
> channel.
> 
> In gcc_check master-aarch64 after:
> 
>   | commit gcc-14-5794-g7a6a29c455e
>   | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
>   | Date:   Tue Sep 19 13:23:13 2023 +0100
>   |
>   |     libstdc++: Define std::ranges::to for C++23 (P1206R7) [PR111055]
>   |
>   |     This adds the std::ranges::to functions for C++23. The rest of P1206R7
>   |     is not yet implemented, i.e. the new constructors taking the
>   |     std::from_range tag, and the new insert_range, assign_range, etc.
> member
>   |     functions. std::ranges::to works with the standard containers even
>   |     without the new constructors, so this is useful immediately.
>   | ... 18 lines of the commit log omitted.
> 
> FAIL: 1 regressions
> 
> regressions.sum:
>               === g++ tests ===
> 
> Running g++:g++.dg/modules/modules.exp ...
> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess
> errors)
> 
>               === Results Summary ===
> 
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
>  - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-
> build/1240/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ .
> The full lists of regressions and progressions are in
>  - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-
> build/1240/artifact/artifacts/notify/ .
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
>  - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-
> build/1240/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail .
> 
> The configuration of this build is:
> CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64
> 
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<----------------
> ----------
> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
> 
> Current build   : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-
> build/1240/artifact/artifacts
> Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-
> build/1239/artifact/artifacts
> 
> Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-
> us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-
> commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/7a6a29c455e7755b501c0006e39beb4e56ec27
> 29/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt
> 
> Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-
> mirror/gcc/commit/7a6a29c455e7755b501c0006e39beb4e56ec2729
> 
> Latest bug report status : https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1036
> 
> List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
> * tcwg_gcc_check
> ** master-aarch64
> *** FAIL: 1 regressions
> *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-
> commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/7a6a29c455e7755b501c0006e39beb4e56ec27
> 29/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/details.txt
> *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1240/
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to