> On Jan 27, 2024, at 17:25, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1121 , > please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. > > In master-arm after: > > | commit gdb-14-branchpoint-1356-g7737b133640 > | Author: Tom Tromey <tro...@adacore.com> > | Date: Tue Jan 9 11:47:17 2024 -0700 > | > | Handle DW_AT_endianity on enumeration types > | > | A user found that gdb would not correctly print a field from an Ada > | record using the scalar storage order feature. We tracked this down > | to a combination of problems. > | > | First, GCC did not emit DW_AT_endianity on the enumeration type. > | ... 14 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gdb tests === > > Running gdb:gdb.ada/scalar_storage.exp ... > FAIL: gdb.ada/scalar_storage.exp: print V_BE
Hi Tom, I see the above failure for both aarch64-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabihf in our testing. The log shows ([1]): === Breakpoint 1, storage () at /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/scalar_storage/storage.adb:53 53 Do_Nothing (V_LE'Address); -- START (gdb) print V_LE $1 = (value => 126, another_value => 12, color => green) (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/scalar_storage.exp: print V_LE get_compiler_info: gcc-14-0-1 print V_BE $2 = (value => 126, another_value => 12, color => red) (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/scalar_storage.exp: print V_BE === Any idea what can be causing this? This failure happens in CI configurations where we track tip-of-trunk GCC. [1] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/gdb.log.xz Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > > === Results Summary === > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1076/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ > . > The full lists of regressions and progressions are in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1076/artifact/artifacts/notify/ > . > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1076/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > . > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1076/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1075/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gdb/sha1/7737b1336402cd4682538620ab996bdb7ad0ea79/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=7737b1336402cd4682538620ab996bdb7ad0ea79 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb > ** master-arm > *** FAIL: 1 regressions > *** > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gdb/sha1/7737b1336402cd4682538620ab996bdb7ad0ea79/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb/master-arm/details.txt > *** > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1076/artifact/artifacts _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
