Hi, I am looking into these regressions. Regards, Surya
On 26/06/24 7:51 am, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1270 , > please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf5 > | Author: Surya Kumari Jangala <jskum...@linux.ibm.com> > | Date: Tue Jun 25 08:37:49 2024 -0500 > | > | ira: Scale save/restore costs of callee save registers with block > frequency > | > | In assign_hard_reg(), when computing the costs of the hard registers, > the > | cost of saving/restoring a callee-save hard register in prolog/epilog > is > | taken into consideration. However, this cost is not scaled with the > entry > | block frequency. Without scaling, the cost of saving/restoring is > quite > | small and this can result in a callee-save register being chosen by > | ... 14 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 4 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === g++ tests === > > Running g++:g++.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/cpy_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve > -moverride=tune=none check-function-bodies dup_x0_m > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/pr10474.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing > shrink-wrapping" > > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ... > ... and 5 more entries > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ > The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make > commands are in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts/notify/ > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2234/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b2657b/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b2657b > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 4 regressions > *** > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b2657b/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/details.txt > *** > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
