Thank you both for the quick responses! On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 5:03 AM Omair Javaid <omair.jav...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 at 14:56, David Spickett <david.spick...@linaro.org> > wrote: > >> This is one for @Omair Javaid <omair.jav...@linaro.org> who is on bots >> this week. >> >> But to save him some confusion, I noticed that the next build >> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/122/builds/151 passes. This is >> because >> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/038bc1c18c786e14cc306401b00144265f8860f5 >> required lld which surprisingly, makes the test unsupported? >> >> UNSUPPORTED: Profile-armhf :: Linux/instrprof-vtable-value-prof.cpp >> (74341 of 77518) >> >> Which is odd because it's enabled in both stages and used to link in >> stage 2. >> > I am guessing behavior is intended as LLVM_ENABLE_LLD=ON is not setting > CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER for stage 2. Should we expect clang to use just built > lld in stage 2 by default without even setting CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER? > >> Did you get any other notifications of the same include issue, >> particularly from Linaro's other builders? >> > Not really. I only received two buildbot failure email notifications, one is 'fatal error: 'cstdio' file not found' as being discussed here, and the other <https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/95/builds/672> failure is from buildbot clang-ppc64le-linux-test-suite and fixed by commit 038bc1c <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/038bc1c18c786e14cc306401b00144265f8860f5>. With the change to require lld, it's likely the test runs on a smaller set of buildbots though. On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 at 10:39, mingmingl <minglot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Greetings! >>> This is Mingming and I'm an LLVM contributor. I have received a lot of >>> useful code review feedback from aarch64 experts. Thank you for all of >>> that! >>> >>> I'm writing to report a failure ( >>> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/122/builds/150) on buildbot >>> clang-armv8-lld-2stage triggered by my recent patch. The issue seems to >>> stem from the C++ standard libraries not being configured in the buildbot >>> environment. >>> >>> While using a c-style header is a workaround (which pr 97245 >>> <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97245> did), @petrhosek >>> reminded >>> me that it would be good to inform maintainers so they can take a look, >>> which makes sense to me. >>> >>> Could someone please assist in resolving this configuration problem? >>> Thank you in advance and let me know if I miss anything. >>> >>> Thanks, Mingming >>> _______________________________________________ >>> linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org >>> >> _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
