On Fri, 04 May 2012 12:19:25 -0500, Andy Doan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/04/2012 12:18 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > So we'd have: > > > > * production: duh > > * staging: this is _solely_ used to determine if changes that have > > landed to the trunk of some component are safe to deploy to > > production > > * dogfood: random hacking > > > > I think that potentially we could have some way of bringing up dogfood > > instances as needed in our private cloud, but tbh for now one on control > > that we share amongst ourselves in a loose way (i.e. check on IRC before > > doing stuff with it) would be a useful thing. > > > > What do you guys think? > > I'm +1 on this. I'd been thinking the same thing. I want it really easy > to try out a change that hasn't yet been merged and "dogfood" fits that > requirement. I'm not a huge fan of the name, but I can't think of > anything better and don't want to get stuck bike-shedding.
I'm just stealing names/process from the Launchpad team, as usual :-) > Along the lines of another thread we had. I think we should have one > dedicated board for this instance also. Yeah, indeed. Cheers, mwh _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
