On 23 Feb 2000, Michael Stutz proposed:
> The aggregation of the Work with other works which are not
> based on the Work -- such as but not limited to inclusion in
> a publication, broadcast, compilation, or other media -- does
> not bring the other works in the scope of the License; nor does
> such aggregation void the terms of the License for the Work.
>
> 4. MODIFICATION.
>
> Permission is granted to modify or sample from a copy of the
> Work, producing a derivative work, and to distribute the
> derivative work under the terms described in the section for
> distribution above, provided that the following terms are met:
>
> (a) The new, derivative work is published under the terms of
> this License.
A question discussed last May in the "licensing" thread:
Is use of a DSL song in a movie/music video/commercial
soundtrack an aggregate or derivative work?
> (b) The derivative work is given a new name, so that its
> name or title can not be confused with the Work, or with
> a version of the Work, in any way.
Potential gray area in what distinguishes a derivative of
the Work from a version of the Work, thence the issue
of when licensing stipulates the Work must be retitled.
