On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Markus Grabner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2012, 21:18:11 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> The Kconfig entry notes that doing the impulse response test inside
>> the kernel avoids buffering/latency issues but it's not clear to me
>> that this code really needs to be in the kernel.  If a userspace
>> impulse response test application uses the same buffer size as the PCM
>> USB traffic, then it should be just as good?
> This is not possible with a PCM API at least for the PODxt since subsequent
> packages in the stream vary in size

Interesting, I didn't know the buffer size can change.

Stefan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: 
TUNE You got it built. Now make it sing. Tune shows you how.
http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Line6linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/line6linux-devel

Reply via email to