I just tried it out on my own system and it does indeed show that it is using 98% of the CPU. I don't think that's true tho'. My system runs just fine with the MUS running. Maybe it's like older versions of Director that would report using 100% of the CPU when in fact it wasn't. I wonder if this is known by MM.
...Neil At 02:36 PM 8/20/2002 +0200, you wrote: >Sigh... > >My ISP accepted to run SMUS 3.0, but when they realized it takes 98% >processor on a Windows 2000, PIII 1GHz they removed it. This is with NO >traffic at all - just running the server. > >It seems odd. When I run it on a Mac on my LAN it doesn't affect the >performance of the computer at all. I would rather say it's very lean. > >-A. [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
