Re: Macromedia Logo

[Daniel Nelson]

According to the website, "Developers creating content with previous  
releases  still need to abide by the terms they agreed to when they  
started using the  software. This includes Made with Macromedia  
program."  It makes sense from several angles, not the least of which  
is another reason to upgrade. =)

(quoted from  
http://www.macromedia.com/support/director/ts/documents/ 
made_with_macromedia.htm)

Regards,

Daniel

On Mar 24, 2004, at 5:00 PM, Kerry Thompson wrote:

Thanks, I'm using d85 I will look it up.
You know, that raises an interesting question. Since Macromedia have
dropped the requirement for the logo, do we still have to use it for
projects done in pre-MX 2004?
It doesn't seem logical to me that we would, but marketers and lawyers
often use different logic than I do.
What would be the point of requiring it now? "Look, this product was
made with an old version of Director!"
Cordially,

Kerry Thompson
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]