URLEncode/Decode?
At 03:55 AM 6/24/2004, you wrote:
At 11:31 Uhr +0100 24.06.2004, James Newton wrote:
That means using 20 times the bandwidth.
you're right.
there's always a disadvantage, when doing such things for lazyness reasons ;-)
the only backdoor left for me now would be to recommend stripping the html header and the font tag before sending and adding it after receiving, but I confess, that would be even more hackish... ;-)
--
||| ażex --
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
