I'm not going to complain too much about members of the list who are posting from corporate accounts that require tombs of disclaimers and copyright notices. I don't think I'd ever win that battle. But it sure would be nice if everyone was a little more consciencious about copying all that junk into their replies and posting them back to the list again. I think the lawyers would agree that replies to the original post don't need the legal text, as long as the original had it. Let's all try to [snip] that stuff out when we reply...OK?
Tab, you're excluded. You can do whatever you damn well please. Christopher Watson Sr. Software Engineer Director/Shockwave Development Lightspan, Inc. 858-824-8457 -----Original Message----- From: Tab Julius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: <lingo-l> value() - is it fast? Depends what you're giving it. It's fast enough, but if it's a complicate set of handler calls and things like that, it may take some time. If it's just string conversions to numbers, it's not as bad. At 10:16 AM 11/30/01 +0000, Simon Wheatley wrote: >How is the speed of the lingo function value()? If I really hammer it >(several hundred calls a frame) will it slow me down a lot? > >Cheers > >Simon > > >______________________________________________________________ > >CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE [snip] [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
