Send Link mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Link digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: ChatGPT users shocked to learn their chats were in Google
search results (David)
2. ????? ?????? ?? ?????? (walid falcon)
3. Re: Certificate of Paternity in Morocco (was: ????? ?????? ??
?????? (Kim Holburn)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 13:12:09 +1000
From: David <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [LINK] Re: ChatGPT users shocked to learn their chats were in
Google search results
Message-ID: <2819721.QOukoFCf94@ulysses>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Saturday, 2 August 2025 09:37:57 AEST Kim Holburn wrote:
> "When users clicked 'Share,' they were presented with an option to tick a box
> labeled 'Make this chat discoverable.' Beneath that, in smaller, lighter
> text, was a caveat explaining that the chat could then appear in search
> engine results."
>
> At first, OpenAI defended the labeling as "sufficiently clear," Fast Company
> reported Thursday. But Stuckey confirmed that "ultimately," the AI company
> decided that the feature "introduced too many opportunities for folks to
> accidentally share things they didn't intend to."
So does Google / OpenAI check that _all subscribers_ to a chat have agreed to
make the content public, or only the currently active subscribers, or perhaps
only the person who initially set it up, and how do they handle a new
subscriber with a different intention?
Why would users wish to make their chats discoverable anyway?
Call me a cynic, but I have a vision of executives pacing around their offices
with furrowed brows thinking "Dammit, we should have thought of that... how can
we possibly compensate all those damaged "folks" before they sue?"
_DavidL_
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 19:56:30 +0100
From: walid falcon <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [LINK] ????? ?????? ?? ??????
Message-ID:
<caedhreqazsrvx2nghhk_xqlhvcpkjh_r+trd3c9wel2fzmn...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
?? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ???????
????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ???????
https://www.targir.com/2025/04/blog-post_14.html
??????? ????? ???????? ????? ?????? ?????????? ????????? ???????? ???
?? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ???????
????? ?????? ????? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????
??? ????? ?????? ?????????? ?? ??? ??? ???? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????? ????.
????? ??? ??????? ????? ?? ????????? ???????? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??????
???????.
??????? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ??????
1. ??????? ??? ???????? ?? ?????? ???????
????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ?? ??????? ???? ??????? ?? ???? ??????
???????? ????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ??????.
2. ????? ????? ?? ???? ??? ????
?? ????? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ???????? ????? ??? ??????? ??????
??????? ???????.
??????? ?????? ??? ????? ??????
????: ??? ???? ???? ???????
????? ??? ???? ?? ??? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ??????? ?????????? ???? ???
???? ??? ??? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ??? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ??????.
??????: ??????? ????????
???? ?? ????? ??????? ???????
??? ???????? ????? ?????? (?? ????)
????? ???? ???????
????? ??????
????? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ???? ??????
????? ????? ?????? pdf
???? ??? ??????? ??????????? ????? ????? ????? ?????? PDF ???? ???????? ???
?? ??????? ?????? ?? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????
??????? ?????? ?????.
??????? ??????? ??? ????? ??????
?? ???? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ???????????
??? ??????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???? ???????.
?? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ???????
?? ????? ????? ??? ??? ???????? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?????
??? ????? ?????.
??? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ????????? ??????
?? ????? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ????????? ??????
???? ???? ???? ??????? ???:
1. ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????
?????? ?? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ????????? ????? ????? ???? ??? ??????? ?????
??????? ??? ?? ????? ??:
??????? ???????? ???????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ???????
????? ???? ??????
??????? ?????? ??????????
2. ??????? ??????? ????? ?????
?? ????? ??? ???? ????? ???? ????? ??? ??????? ?? ????? ??????? ??? ?????
?? ????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ?????????? ??? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??????
?? ??? ??????? ????????? ??????.
????? ??????
?????? ?? ??? ??????? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?????
?????? ?? ???? ?? ??? ??????? ????????.
???? ?????
??????? ?????? ???????
??????? ????????
??????? ?????? :
? ????? ??????? ?
? ?????? ???????
??????? ?????? :
? ????? ????? ???? ?
? ?????? ??????? .
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ????????
??????? ???????? ??????? ???? ????? ???? ?????
??????? ??????? ?????? ??????
??????? ???????? ??????? ???? ????? ???? ?????
?? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ??????
????? ??????
???? ???????
????? ?????? ???????? ????????
???? ????????? (??????? ???????)
????? ?????? ???????? ????????_?????
????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ???????
????? ????? ?????? ???????
????? ?????? ??: [??? ???????]
??? ?????: [????? ???????]
??? ??????: [????? ???????]
???? ????? ???????
??? ?????? ?????:
????? ??????: [????? ?????? ????]
??? ????? ??????? ???????: [??? CIN]
????? ????? ????????: [????? ????? ????? ????]
??????? ??????: [????? ???????]
??????: [?????? ???????]
?????? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ??????? ??????????? ??? ???:
?? ????? (?) ?????? (?): [??? ?????/?]
??????? (?) ??????: [????? ???????]
??: [???? ???????]
??(??) ????/????? ?????????(?)? ??? ????(?) ????? ????? ????? ????? ????
???? ??????:
[??? ????]? ???????? ??????: [????? ????? ????]? ???????? ???? ?????
??????? ???????: [??? CIN ????].
?????? ???? ????????? ????????? ???????? ???? ??? ?????/?? ????? ?? ???????
??????? ????? ??? ????? ???? ??? ????? ??? ??????? ?? ??????? ?? ??????
???????.
???????
????? ??????: _____________________
???????: ___________________________
???????: ____ / ____ / ________
??????? :
????? ??? ??????? ???????? ??????? ??: ???? ??????? ???????? ????? ???????
????? ???????? ??????.
?????? ??? ????? ??? ??????? ?????????? (??? ???? ??????) ???? ??? ???
???????? ??? ????? ????? ?? ??? ??? ????.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 09:34:12 +1000
From: Kim Holburn <[email protected]>
To: Link mailing list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LINK] Certificate of Paternity in Morocco (was: ?????
?????? ?? ??????
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
This is not an appropriate mailing list for Moroccan law.
On 3/8/2025 4:56 am, walid falcon wrote:
> ?? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ???????
>
>
>
>
> ????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ???????
> https://www.targir.com/2025/04/blog-post_14.html
>
>
>
> ??????? ????? ???????? ????? ?????? ?????????? ????????? ???????? ???
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
--
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
+61 404072753
mailto:[email protected] aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
------------------------------
End of Link Digest, Vol 393, Issue 4
************************************
