At 10:33 +1100 6/12/14, Frank O'Connor wrote:
>And as for experimental equipment ... well, suffice it to say that if ... 
>Galileo's lenses ... had been patented/copyrighted then a hell of a lot of 
>science and research would not have applied. 

A quibble:  

Galileo nicked the telescope from some Dutchmen.  

He was a serial nicker, standing on the shoulders of giants, doing interesting 
things, and cocking a snoot at convention - which was dangerous when 'the 
convention' was the Catholic Church, which was powerful and inclined to torture 
and/or burn people.

But, in any case, Frank's point is entirely valid.  

It was crucial that Galileo be free to point the Dutchmen's tube in a different 
direction.  Without that, the discovery that Saturn has moons would have been 
delayed.  

Given that the heliocentrism was one of the critical revolutions (so to speak) 
that undermined said conventions, intellectual progress was driven by Galileo's 
potentially patent-breaching actions.

[Caveat:  done quickly from memory, and my HPS readings go back 40 years.]

-- 
Roger Clarke                                 http://www.rogerclarke.com/
                                     
Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd      78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Tel: +61 2 6288 6916                        http://about.me/roger.clarke
mailto:roger.cla...@xamax.com.au                http://www.xamax.com.au/ 

Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Law            University of N.S.W.
Visiting Professor in Computer Science    Australian National University
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to