Thanks Stephen
Some 'person' on Twitter on the #budgetreply thread just said coding was a 
deadend job. I sent him this link. And he says he's "in IT". That's a worry!
Jan

At 09:58 PM 14/05/2015, Stephen Loosley wrote:

>http://www.msn.com/en-au/motoring/reviews/new-ford-gt-operating-system-has-more-lines-of-code-than-a-boeing-787-dreamliner/
>
>
>Speaking with the media at a Ford GT forum in Detroit, chief engineer Jamal 
>Hameedi revealed the new Ford GT is a vastly different car than its 2005 
>predecessor.
>
>While ABS was the most high-tech system of the 2005 Ford GT, the new GT 
>employees over 50 different sensors feeding 28 microprocessors and refreshed 
>every eight milliseconds.
>
>There are six communication area networks which, via 3000 different signals, 
>generate 300MB of data per second (over 100GB of data per hour).
>
>Hameedi claims the new GT employs 10 million lines of ‘mission critical’ 
>software code, three million more than the new Boeing 787 dreamliner and eight 
>million more than an F22 fighter jet - though one could argue that more code 
>isn’t necessarily a good thing.
>
>According to Hameedi the real challenge is getting all the signals to talk to 
>each other while making sure “when one sensor shuts down it doesn’t crash 
>the whole system”.
>
>The data rate is refreshed every eight milliseconds and includes the following 
>sensor sets:
>
>Front safety sensors
>Outside temperature sensors
>Sunload sensor
>Humidity sensor
>Gyro sensor
>Auto dimming mirror sensors
>Occupation classification sensor
>Wing position sensor
>ABS wheel speed sensors
>Steering wheel position sensor
>Pedal position sensors
>Door window position sensor
>Side impact sensor
>Tyre pressure sensor
>Vehicle speed sensor
>Meanwhile the 28 microprocessors take the sensor data and manage everything 
>from body, transaxle and hydraulic control to simple things like the door 
>latches, which have their own unique processor. 
>
>Hameedi says the introduction of so much computing power means the new GT will 
>be safer and faster for “99 out of 100 drivers”, while for those wannabe 
>or actual professional racing drivers it still manages to provide systems such 
>as active aerodynamic control that would have otherwise been impossible.
>
>But despite all its computing power, Ford engineers are still debating whether 
>the car’s Track mode (one of four, along with Normal, Sport, and Wet) will 
>actually switch all the control aids off or simply increase the tolerance 
>substantially and leave some systems still on.
>
>“Do you truly turn everything off if you can make the car go faster with 
>some things on? Do you leave them on or do you truly say do you want 
>everything off? Okay then, you can be the slower guy but the hero,” Hameedi 
>told CarAdvice. 
>
>The new Ford GT is powered by a twin-turbocharged 3.5-litre V6 petrol engine 
>with about 450kW (exact figures are yet to be released), delivered to the rear 
>wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transaxle. Ford GT production will be 
>capped and, as previously reported, the GT will not be made in right-hand 
>drive.
>--
>
>Cheers,
>Stephen
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Link mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

I write books. http://janwhitaker.com/?page_id=8

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
[email protected]
Twitter: <https://twitter.com/JL_Whitaker>JL_Whitaker
Blog: www.janwhitaker.com 

Sooner or later, I hate to break it to you, you're gonna die, so how do you 
fill in the space between here and there? It's yours. Seize your space. 
~Margaret Atwood, writer 

_ __________________ _
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to