Stephen, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Stephen Loosley <stephenloos...@outlook.com> wrote: > As previously reported, the order from the Court allows ISPs to choose how to > implement > the blockade, including DNS blocking, IP address blocking (or IP re-routing), > URL blocking, > or “any alternative technical means” approved by a rightsholder.
It wouldn't be unreasonable to assume that when complying with the order made the court that their network engineers were also aware of the workaround before this change was implemented too? Furthermore, Telstra could argue it would be oppressive for the rights holder to demand the blocking of outbound DNS traffic on the basis of critical infrastructure, etc -- Regards, Christian Heinrich http://cmlh.id.au/contact _______________________________________________ Link mailing list Link@mailman.anu.edu.au http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
