> Sunday, 1 September 2019 5:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [LINK] "Group Assessment"
>
> How to effectively teach multicultural classes within a limited budget
> and in a way that’s fair to everyone? Maybe your digital initiatives can
> be one answer.   Whatever, it must involve much more than a current
> inadequate ANU policy? For eg, only in their first year they get a third
> extra-time, and, are allowed to use a language dictionary! This seems
> a hopeless, inadequate and pathetic solution to this problem  (snip)
> Ref: https://policies.anu.edu.au/ppl/document/ANUP_004603


Opinion: Australian universities

“Take the money and run: how Australian universities let down their Chinese 
students”

“Our institutions are quick to accept Chinese students’ money, but far too slow 
to invest in the tools to ensure their inclusion”

By  Yang Tian  (Yang Tian works for the digital community team at Guardian 
Australia)  Mon 2nd Sep 2019
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/02/take-the-money-and-run-how-australian-universities-let-down-their-chinese-students

.. Chinese students are not oblivious to their perceived limitations; in fact, 
they are continually reminded of them as they navigate an education system that 
operates without them in mind. Concepts that local students struggle with 
become inscrutable, assigned readings take twice or triple the time to 
complete, and written assessments become Sisyphean tasks to overcome.

A degree should be challenging, but not insurmountable.

Whether it’s reevaluating entry requirements, implementing supplementary 
language training tailored to course content, investing in bilingual teachers 
or translators in tutorials, the bureaucracies that willingly take Chinese 
students’ money need to invest in resources to facilitate their inclusion.

Measures should be taken to ensure that students, both local and international, 
can focus on the experiences and ideas they have to offer each other.

Among the Chinese students I shared classrooms with were experienced 
journalists who worked at their hometown news stations, staff writers for 
metropolitan papers, visual artists with featured exhibitions, and aspiring 
documentary makers ... This is a community bursting at the seams with untapped 
potential, but without the support structures to empower their learning and 
help articulate their needs, the championing of diversity will continue to ring 
hollow.

Until we humanise Chinese students in the public discourse, academic 
institutions will continue to use dollar signs as placeholders for their hopes 
and dreams. It is our collective loss if these organisations can’t muster the 
interest to try and understand their perspectives, especially when so many 
stretch themselves to understand us.
--

Also: 
https://www.smh.com.au/national/sydney-universities-hiding-from-the-facts-about-chinese-students-20190820-p52ivl.html

Roughly 24 per cent of all students at the University of Sydney come from 
China. The figures are nearly as high at UNSW (23 per cent) and UTS (17 per 
cent). There are more Chinese students at these three inner-Sydney universities 
than in all 33 public universities in the US state of California. This 
extraordinary concentration makes it all too easy for Chinese students to live 
in a Chinese bubble.

Every semester I have Chinese students in my classes who struggle to have even 
basic conversations with me about their homework. Forget about class 
discussion. And I teach in the social sciences, which attract a culturally 
curious student body. I hear stories of business students who complete entire 
semester-long team projects in Chinese, then let the best English speaker in 
the group write up the results.

Australian universities are simply admitting too many Chinese students, and too 
many of them can't comfortably express themselves in English. Minimum language 
requirements for direct admission are generally adequate, but many Chinese 
students enter with lower scores through back-door university "foundation" 
programs. Exactly how many is a mystery, because these privately operated 
preparatory programs do not report student numbers.

International students who come in with good language skills and immediately 
immerse themselves in local social life are likely to be ready for success by 
the time they get down to serious academic work in their second and third 
years. Chinese students who spend their first year living in Sydney's China 
bubble never get better. Some have even told me that their English language 
skills deteriorated at university.

With so many students struggling with the language, academic standards 
inevitably suffer. I can teach simple factual material to students with limited 
English, but I can't engage them in sophisticated team projects. In my 
quantitative methods class, I can teach them statistical techniques, but I 
can't teach them when and how to use them. Worst of all, I can't teach them how 
to write meaningful term papers, because I don't have the time or the training 
to teach them how to write English in the first place.

For example, most Australians know that in China, family names come first and 
personal names second: Xi Jinping is President Xi, not President Jinping. Yet I 
have taught Chinese students in their second or third year at the University of 
Sydney who still can't alphabetise Western authors by family name in a 
reference list. Some can't even distinguish between the name of a journal and 
the title of an article in that journal. It really is that bad.

Unfortunately, all of this is anecdotal. Every colleague I talk to has the same 
stories to tell, but we don't have any data to offer. Universities could easily 
collect the data, but they refuse to admit that they have a problem. Instead, 
they hide behind the pro forma stance that any student who passes the minimum 
English requirements for admission is ready to study in English.

Well, my Chinese students speak and write pro forma English. That's not good 
enough. We owe it to them to help them improve their English language skills, 
and that means admitting fewer Chinese students, then giving them more support 
when they arrive. Anyone who spends four years and six figures on an Australian 
university degree should at least graduate fluent in English. It's our 
responsibility to make sure that they do.

Salvatore Babones is an adjunct scholar at the Centre for Independent Studies, 
an associate professor at the University of Sydney, and author of the paper The 
China Student Boom and the Risks It Poses to Australian Universities.
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to