On 14/7/20 9:34 am, Karl Auer wrote:

It cost a lot of money that could have been far better spent on other
things. ...

The COVIDSafe App only cost a tiny fraction of the billions spent on COVID-19. The app was oversold, but at least it appears to have done no direct harm, unlike some other measures.

But an App which works well and does not infringe privacy would be useful. This might be done in conjunction with Apple and Google. This could be branded "COVIDSafe 2.0", to save the government the embarrassment of admitting failure.

The program is yet another IT debacle ...

What worries me is that Australia has got used to implementing pandemic measures in a relatively benign environment and on the assumption these will be short term. Governments need to help the public maintain public health measures as routine, for years, and possibly under much more difficult conditions.

Consider controlling the pandemic at the same time there are widespread bush-fires, floods, or cyclones, or if the ADF is committed overseas in its primary mission of defending the country, or with cyber attacks interrupting power, water, health and food supplies, or while misinformation campaigns cause civil unrest, or all of these at the same time.


--
Tom Worthington, MEd FHEA FACS CP IP3P http://www.tomw.net.au +61(0)419496150
TomW Communications Pty Ltd. PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617, Australia
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Prof. Standards Legislation

Honorary Lecturer, Computer Science, Australian National University https://cecs.anu.edu.au/research/profile/tom-worthington
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to