On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 23:36 +0000, Stephen Loosley wrote: > Just wondering, does the content pass the pub (Link) consensus for > reasoning?
Seems plausible. The numbers are poorly expressed at best, for example it says (but I presume doesn't mean) that all people hospitalised will get permanent heart damage. It's also not clear whether or how much the numbers overlap, I would assume there is a lot of overlap. And it doesn't make clear that a sick person, especially a long-term sick person, has (in general) a far greater impact than a dead person. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer GPG fingerprint: 2561 E9EC D868 E73C 8AF1 49CF EE50 4B1D CCA1 5170 Old fingerprint: 8D08 9CAA 649A AFEF E862 062A 2E97 42D4 A2A0 616D _______________________________________________ Link mailing list Link@mailman.anu.edu.au http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link