Hi Mark, Sure - that'd save me from doing it all over again! Thanks much. Email addy is in the sig.
Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer Internal Revenue Service - Room 6030 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20224 Voice: (202) 927-4188 FAX: (202) 622-6726 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----Original Message----- From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RedHat 7.2 Code Changes Between RC2 and GA Mike, There wasn't a lot of difference, but more than just a few files. I pointed my web browser at Red Hat's FTP server, did a cut and paste of the RPMS directory, and stuck that in a file. Then, I wrote a small Rexx exec to take that and compare it to an "ls -l>output" command run on my local system to tell me what I needed to download. It only looked at file sizes, not dates, but it was enough to save me from downloading the entire GA directory. I can send the Rexx program to you if you want. Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: Coffin Michael C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RedHat 7.2 Code Changes Between RC2 and GA Hi David, Can you tell me what was changed (if anything) between RedHat 7.2 RC2 and the GA release? Is there a README or page somewhere that I can refer to? I'd like to upgrade my RC2 system to GA levels of code, but if little/nothing has changed it will save me a lot of time. -Thanks in advance. Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer Internal Revenue Service - Room 6030 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20224 Voice: (202) 927-4188 FAX: (202) 622-6726 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----Original Message----- From: David Sainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap Hi Gordon, On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:54:31AM -0800, Wolfe, Gordon W wrote: > You can still get Red Hat for free, but it's a partial distribution with few > or no program products. And Red Hat has stated that if it can't make money > it will get back out of the business. <snip> > the other distributions like Cayman and Debian. Red Hat has the whole OCO > problem with OSA, no support for LVM, and the Beta Oracle will only run on > SuSE at this time. (We do a LOT of Oracle on VM and Oracle isn't enhancing > the product for VM/CMS.) I just have to comment on a few of the issues you raise here. I admit that I find your comment about the Red Hat Linux for S/390 product being "a partial distribution with few or no program products" somewhat bewildering. As somebody who invested a rather large amount of time in ensuring the Red Hat Linux for S/390 product offering was comprehensive, well tested, complete and able to be supported by Red Hat's A-grade global support and consulting teams, I would be happy to discuss what it is you feel the product is missing right at this point in time. If the "no program products" means "no LVM or OSA", then I am sure a Red Hatter would be more than happy to go through the finer points of these decisions, and the work-arounds that are available. Just briefly, let me clarify: - Red Hat really looks forward to the time when an LVM implementation is ready for real-world enterprise use. As soon as that time comes, you can be sure that LVM will be available to all our customers. Until then, you still have RAID (md) support enabled in the kernel and installer (TUI and GUI). - the OSA OCO modules have been released by IBM for the kernel that ships in Red Hat Linux for S/390 (2.4.9-17). See: http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/special_oco _rh_2.4.shtml We continue to work with IBM on this matter, and _do_ want the best long-term benefit for our valued customers. - The Red Hat Linux for S/390 product is available in the form of a tree, downloadable from: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/os/s390/ This tree is free (in dollar terms) for those who wish to use it. Red Hat continues to believe in Open Source. Red Hat continues to want the very best for its customers (not just the latest and greatest, but also high quality, reliability and supportability). Red Hat also listens to feedback. Gordon, if you wish to discuss how Red Hat can better help you, again, feel free to contact me (and the same goes for anybody else). Regards, DS.. /* David Sainty, Open Source Technology Researcher, Red Hat, Inc. */ /* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.redhat.com/ Facta Non Verba. */ /* Registered Linux User #23207 - http://counter.li.org */
