William,

If the previous OS such as OS/390 had the OSA defined to it the portname
will be specified by OS/390. Change your TCPIP defs for zVM to specify the
original portname from the previous or other OS sharing the adapter. If the
portnames match you can share the OSA adapter. I recently ran into this
with zVM 4.2 in an lpar sharing the OSA with OS/390 v2.10. OS/390 had set
the portname and zVM TCPIP could not open the adapter. I do not remember
the original failing messages from zVM.  Good Luck ....

Regards,
Terry L. Spaulding
IBM Global Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


William Scully wrote:

The Linux systems are running under VM in an LPAR.  Other nodes using the
OSA adapters are in separate LPARs.  I've asked and I'm told that no other
system explicitly specifies a portname.

I wanted to check this assertion.  So we took one of the "failing" OSA
adapters and gave it to TCP/IP on VM, which did initialize and successfully
used the OSA adapter.  Had OS/390 on another node specified a portname I
would have expected that TCP/IP on VM would -not- be able to use the card.
I'm not certain that this result is definitive but given what I read in the
TCP/IP documentation for VM (which says the portname -MUST- match) I expect
so.

Thanks for the suggestion.  Any other ideas would be appreciated!

-----Original Message-----
From: John P Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OSA


Is the VM system in an LPAR? If so and another system uses the GB
ethernet adapter, which is IPLed before yours, then I believe that
system would determine what the portname is. Just a thought.

>> ...we're suddenly having trouble using our OSA adapters.  The problem
first surfaced after VM was recently restarted
>> after the upgrade of the processor microcode...

--
John P Taylor
Linux & VM Systems Support
Hursley IT
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to