On Tuesday, 05/07/2002 at 11:02 EST, Rick Troth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[snip] > > Now ... it would be really sweet if CMS had an EXT2 utility or driver > (or both!). The utility would be easiest to implement by way of > contributed code. The driver would require either hooking the CMS > nucleus in kinky and unusual ways OR support from IBM, both difficult > but fun challenges. Some have discussed a utility privately. > I have yet to see, or to produce, any code for it.
I don't see it in my crystal ball. Since you've written cmsfs & co., (thanks!) there's no value in providing ext2 (no, I mean ext3, no, I mean gpfs, no, I mean.....wait...uh...) support in CMS. Alan Altmark Sr. Software Engineer IBM z/VM Development
