At 23:36 11-10-02, Rick Troth wrote: >That's not a caveat. That's just how life is with NSS: snapshot. >And if we had the STM support in the kernel for 'IPL sys PARM parms' >to work, it would not even be an issue!!
Come on Rick. That isn't true with CMS either. Provided you save the NSS early enough it will be before the kernel finds out the virtual machine size etc. If you would not include the dasd= in the NSS you would require each Linux guest to have that on the IPL statement in the CP directory or in the PROFILE EXEC which is not fun either. IPL with initrd like done for SCSI systems is probably the best way to manage this. Rob
