In regards to the problem I was having defining a interface device, we found that the device 11F6 was the culprit. For reasons presently unknown, this device would not work. After switching to 3 new devices, eth0 came up fine. Thanks to everyone for your help.
Michael Lambert On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 15:44, Michael Lambert wrote: > Mark, > > I'm using the OCO modules that IBM supplied with their patches for this > kernel level. > > I got the number "4.28" as microcode level from the processor code level > entry from an OSA query. I can't find a comparable level to yours in > dmesg... > > Michael Lambert > > > From: Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Qeth Problems > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi Michael, > maybe someone else knows better, but the RedHat OCOs don't go as far as > 2.4.17 only 2.4.9-38, the SuSE OCOs go as high as 2.4.19? > Even though you have upgraded your Kernel from 2.4.9 to 2.4.17 will the > OCOs > still work? > Forgive me here, I use SuSE ;-) > > Also you mention microcode of 4.28 - I'm running on a z900 and dmesg > shows > microcode of 323 when the QETH starts up. > > Ciao > Mark > >
