Adam Thornton wrote:

If you have a shared volume, linked read-only, to a virtual machine,
formatted with ext3, then even if you have it specified as ro in
/etc/fstab, you still get errors at boot, presumably as it tries to do
something with the journal inode.

If you mount it as ext2 these errors do not appear,

Shouldn't ext3 see that it's being mounted read-only, and not attempt to
manipulate the journal?

Adam


Since there is no real difference between ext2 and ext3 except for the
journal, just mount it as ext2. There is no reason to mount a read only
filesystem as ext3

Mark Earnest
~~~~~~~~~~
Senior Systems Programmer
Academic Services & Emerging Technologies
Penn State University

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to