I code "chunk-size 4"   which I assume is 4096.

Betsie Spann
VM Systems Programmer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Jarboe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 6:35 AM
Subject: Recommended chunk size with 3390's on s/390 (was RE: mkraid
failure)


> For a related question, man raidtab indicates that "typical values are
> anything from 4k to 128k, the best value should be determined by
> experimenting on a given array, alot depends on the SCSI and disk
> configura-tion."
>
> Should there really be much experimentation required for 3390 volumes on
> s/390?  Is there a, "it should probably be this" value?  I've been using
> chunk-size 4096.
>
> ~ Daniel
>
>
>
> Per Jessen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:44:18 +0000, Ashley Chaloner wrote:
> >
> > >I think the chunk-size shouldn't have the 'k' at the end. Well, mine
> > >doesn't, and it works...
> > >
> >
> > I second that - no 'k' on chunk-size. I didn't bother testing if it
> > failed with a 'k' :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > regards,
> > Per Jessen, Zurich
> > http://www.enidan.com - home of the J1 serial console.
> >
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It may be
> legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only for the use
> of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or
> otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would allow it to be
> viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
> copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information
> herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
> in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this message.
> Thank you.
>

Reply via email to