I code "chunk-size 4" which I assume is 4096. Betsie Spann VM Systems Programmer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Jarboe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 6:35 AM Subject: Recommended chunk size with 3390's on s/390 (was RE: mkraid failure)
> For a related question, man raidtab indicates that "typical values are > anything from 4k to 128k, the best value should be determined by > experimenting on a given array, alot depends on the SCSI and disk > configura-tion." > > Should there really be much experimentation required for 3390 volumes on > s/390? Is there a, "it should probably be this" value? I've been using > chunk-size 4096. > > ~ Daniel > > > > Per Jessen wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:44:18 +0000, Ashley Chaloner wrote: > > > > >I think the chunk-size shouldn't have the 'k' at the end. Well, mine > > >doesn't, and it works... > > > > > > > I second that - no 'k' on chunk-size. I didn't bother testing if it > > failed with a 'k' :-) > > > > > > > > regards, > > Per Jessen, Zurich > > http://www.enidan.com - home of the J1 serial console. > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It may be > legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only for the use > of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or > otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would allow it to be > viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the > reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, > copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information > herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication > in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this message. > Thank you. >