Gregg,
I pre-date them that toys. I did a lot of time on Sigma-9s and
UNIVAC 1100s...
Though I *have* done terminal enemalators for MS-DOS (in TASM) so I
have some experience doing assembler language.
Additionally, never forget the C combines the power of assembly
language with the ease of use of assembly language.
-soup
--------------------
John R. Campbell, Speaker to Machines (GNUrd) {813-356|697}-5322
Adsumo ergo raptus sum
MacOS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging
Windows.
IBM Certified: IBM AIX 4.3 System Administration, System Support
----- Forwarded by John Campbell/Tampa/IBM on 10/29/2003 10:53 AM -----
Gregg C Levine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
et.att.net> cc:
Sent by: Linux on 390 Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Memory
access faults.
Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU>
10/29/2003 10:18 AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
Hello (again) from Gregg C Levine
(I won't state the obvious.)
John you've just pointed out the reason why I don't like that family
of machines, and its descendants. Also COBOL for the same reason.
As for Assembler, I do. It turns out I became very good at it, during
the 8086, and 80286 days. Wrote code that could solve many a problem,
that refused to be solved, in a higher level language, example Pascal.
Who here recalls the Borland family of products from that age?
-------------------
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke." Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
