On the Java/Tomcat workload we've settled on the 31 bit IBM 1.4.2 SDK after finding that it performs better and eats a little less than the 64 bit SDK (single IFL z800, VM 4.4 with 2GB main storage). Are you seeing the same with multiple IFL's?
-----Original Message----- From: Wolfe, Gordon W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 3:53 PM To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: Poll Results We have 2 IFLs, 6GB main storage, 2GB Xstore, and the workload is all over the place. You name it, we've probably got a server doing it. Samba, Java, NFS, Apache, Tomcat, J2EE, virus scanning, Oracle, MySQL, new software development. Just about anything. We even have one server dedicated to monitoring the performance of the others. Linux and VM to support it is using about half a terabyte of disk; ten 3390-3 volumes just for VM paging. Surprisingly, unless one of the Java or tomcat servers gets active, the CPU load is pretty small. The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. --Alvin Toffler Gordon Wolfe, Ph.D. (425)865-5940 VM Technical Services, The Boeing Company > ---------- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply To: Linux on 390 Port > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 3:42 PM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: Poll Results > > Just curious, what resources are you allocating to VM (real storage, IFL's)? > What type of Linux workload (Java, CUPS, Postfix, Samba, NFS)? > > Steve > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
