> > It was pretty obvious that people wanted a quicker release
> > turnaround and that there were certain bottlenecks in the
> > process. Dropping "exhaustive" support for some architectures
> > wasn't amongst the options discussed if I recall correctly.
> > However the usual call for more people was.

Folks:

1) This is a proposal under discussion, not a statement of direction
from the Debian support team.

2) Debian on 390 has some strong supporters (we burn enough cycles
supporting the development and build systems...)

3) Nothing is permanent or un-fixable in the open source world...8-).

4) 390 is definitely not the hold up for releasing sarge. We've been
ready for *months*.


-- db

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to