On Tuesday, 04/05/2005 at 12:51 PDT, Barton Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone outside of ibm actually implemented PAV > for Linux? From everything i've seen, the requirement > is in VM, not Linux.
Are folks getting excessive device queuing on CP-owned volumes in their production environments? From what I read here, it seems like relatively few people put Linux data on minidisks, preferring (for a variety of reasons) to use fullpack minidisks or volumes carved to size. And our paging rates (without PAV) are nothing to sneeze at. I'm not arguing against PAV, but I'm curious whether the benefit of PAV for CP-owned volumes would be real or just wishful thinking. Alan Altmark Devil's Advocate z/VM Development IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
