Did it say ../lib/libbac.a by chance? If it actually said ..lib/libbac.a then I think the Makefile is bad, or perhaps some option was miss-specified. If it said ../lib/libbac.a then you probably need to cd to ../lib and do a make.
-----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:49 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Question for those "C" types out there I'm doing a make. I get "no rule to make target ..lib/libbac.a neede by 'bacula-sd'. stop." And then it continues with the next process.. That error doesn't sound good. But I can't find anything in the "bacula" manual if this is an error I can ignore or not. One of the problems I've had with installation of bacula, is that I use the default SLES9 install, which apparently doesn't include the development system. So there are a lot of items (such as gcc-c++ and gcc) that I had to install first. Perhaps I haven't got everything yet. As a comparision so far, Amanda was easier to use as it came with the 390 binaries. Bacula apparently only comes in source form, so I have had to build it. It is an interesting exercise and occassionally, building systems will pay off in future Linux stuff, but it is taking a lot longer than Amanda. But so far, I'm ok with that. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
