On Wednesday 20 July 2005 1:07 pm, Brandon Darbro wrote:
Please call into support at Novell and get a bug filed.
-Cameron


> Been having a hell of a time trying to get users ulimit commands to work
>   on SLES 9.  Ulimit kept reporting values were out of range, not matter
> what I placed as hard and soft limits in /etc/security/limits.conf.
>
> Finally figured out the problem.  In /etc/pam.d, only services "login"
> and "sshd" were configured to include the line:
>
> session required        pam_limits.so
>
> As our Oracle DBA's must first login as themselves and then "su -
> oracle" to get into the oracle account, their large ulimit values in
> their .profile were getting the out of range errors.  Well, it's because
> that pam line above wasn't in the "su" pam file.  This drove me crazy
> for a couple hours today until I figured that out.  Thought I'd pass
> that info along, as well as ask the question:
>
> Shouldn't that pam config line above be included in *all* login
> services, such as login, rexec, rlogin, rsh, sshd, su, and sudo?
>
> If you folks agree that should be included in the pam configuration for
> those services, I'll file a bug report with SuSE.
>
> *Brandon Darbro
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
Cameron Seader
Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 801.861.2686
Cell: 801.913.5992
Fax: 801.861.9478

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to