McKown, John wrote: My vote:
"The xinet daemon will fork a separate megagroovy daemon for each user who connects to port 2735. This daemon will then perform the xxx functions as requested by the user."
no
Or "The xinet daemon will fork a separate megagroovy process for each user who connects to port 2735. This process will then perform the xxx functions as requested by the user."
yes
or is either acceptable? I don't want the UNIX heads to start clicking their tongue at my documentation (such as it may or may not be).
Apache docs talk of processes (and maybe threads). I'd go with processes. You have a good precedent. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
