On Monday, 07/25/2005 at 07:00 ZE2, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And you're right, the potential savings with sharing binaries in DCSS > are larger (and probably harder to manage from a software management > point of view). The kernel in NSS and binaries in DCSS are independent > issues that must be implemented separately.
When union mount arrives, managing shared binaries should, hopefully, get easier. Then you don't have to know in advance which files are r/o and which are r/w. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
