I am not a Linux expert, but this sounds like SMF on a z/OS system except
if SMF's pre-allocated datasets are alll full and unusable, you start
losing data - messages are issued to inform you of the fact that you're
losing data, but the process doesn't hang.

As with SMF, it sounds as though the space allocated for the offload files
needs to be able to handle a certain time period (a day is what we use),
and then those files need to be processed and deleted.  Our SMF  tools
take a day's offload files, put them through whatever programs we use to
summarize the information,  combine them onto a tape which is kept for a
while, and delete them.  We also manage the size of the files by setting
parameters for what is recorded.

All of these techniques sound like they'd be useful and applicable to
Linux auditing.

Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
(850) 414-4209



"Meanor, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU>
03/21/2006 06:46 PM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port <LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU>


To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Question






They were talking about LAuS (Linux Audit Subsystem).  I'm not sure
exactly what they were talking about, but by default auditd keeps 4
(preallocated) 20M binary files in which it stores it's audit info.
When one of the binary files fills up, it writes the data to a unique
file (save.1, save.2, etc, etc) and then switches to the next binary
file.  Over time, this will fill up /var/log/audit.d with these save
files.  If there is not enough available filesystem space to write the
save file, auditd will suspend until there is enough room.  When auditd
is suspended, anything trying to write an audit event (sshd, for
example) goes to sleep until auditd starts accepting events.  The guest
will appear to be hung, but it is actually still functioning (albeit
with limited usefulness).  This is fixed by cleaning up /var then kill
-HUP  the pid of auditd.


-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Phil Smith III
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 5:46 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Question


I got a written comment on the "Sick Penguin" pitch at SHARE that I
can't seem to confirm or refute, despite having spent a bunch o' time
Googling for it.  I figure someone in this group will know!

The comment was:
"FYI, if Linux auditing is enabled, by default file systems >= 80% full
can cause the guest to hang."

(Phil) Really?  Why?  How?  What do they mean by "Linux auditing"?
Maybe they meant "journaling"?

Can anyone shed any light?

Thanks,
...phsiii

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to