I have this SuSE version: 

# uname -a
Linux 2.6.5-7.252-s390x #1 SMP Tue Feb 14 11:11:04 UTC 2006 s390x s390x
s390x GNU/Linux

But I am not sure of which 3590 OCO drive I should have applied. Probably I
installed the wrong one. 

Which driver version is the rightest one for my current SuSE version ? and
how can I install it ?

I have tried to install tape_3590-sles9-2.6.5-7.236-s390x.tar.gz and then 

/tmp/tape3590 # depmod -a
/tmp/tape3590 # modprobe tape_3590  
/lib/modules # lsmod

atlas:/lib/modules # lsmod
Module                  Size  Used by
tape_3590              48648  2
tape                   86568  2 tape_3590
tape_class             21512  1 tape
sg                     68936  0
st                     68920  0
ipv6                  426664  142
sd_mod                 43272  0
sr_mod                 39980  0
scsi_mod              206712  4 sg,st,sd_mod,sr_mod
cdrom                  65320  1 sr_mod
qeth                  245696  0
qdio                   75088  3 qeth
ccwgroup               27648  1 qeth
dm_mod                100120  12
dasd_eckd_mod          89344  60
dasd_mod              103528  61 dasd_eckd_mod
ext3                  184512  11
jbd                   118856  1 ext3
atlas:/lib/modules #




Saludos,


José R. Barón
Dpto. Sistemas
CALCULO S. A.
Tel. 91 330 86 44
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Cornelia
Huck
Enviado el: viernes, 07 de abril de 2006 9:43
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Asunto: Re: SLES9 DB2 Restore Problem with 3590 tapes

On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 22:15:19 -0400
Neale Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's not the tape error per se but the code in the kernel. X'0000' 
> will give you an operation exception and the kernel will throw up its 
> hands and give up.

That's the expected behaviour since the code threw a BUG(), which is
achieved by 0000 on s390 :) It means the tape driver did something strage
which the block layer didn't like at all (and since this happened in
interrupt context, it caused a kernel panic).

> Is this the latest tape mod you have for this kernel?

I'd second that question. The BUG() may have been caused by a problem in the
3590 driver (or the tape_block driver).

Cornelia

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to