I was going to ask if that was a possible better solution to this. Sounds like we're far from ideal on a shared kernel environment.
Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU> To LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU cc 02/23/2007 12:21 AM Subject Re: Perceptions of zLinux Please respond to Linux on 390 Port <LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU> On Friday, 02/23/2007 at 01:21 ZE9, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would expect the modules to be copied to (virtual) RAM, but if you're > using a compressed initrd then they're going to be copied twice. I think what we'd want is to be able to have initrd in an NSS be an uncompressed xip2fs filesystem. xip2fs executes/reads directly from the filesystem; no copies. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390