I was going to ask if that was a possible better solution to this. Sounds like
we're far from ideal on a shared kernel environment.
Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
<LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU>
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
02/23/2007 12:21 AM
Subject
Re:
Perceptions of zLinux
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port <LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU>
On Friday, 02/23/2007 at 01:21 ZE9, John Summerfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would expect the modules to be copied to (virtual) RAM, but if you're
> using a compressed initrd then they're going to be copied twice.
I think what we'd want is to be able to have initrd in an NSS be an
uncompressed xip2fs filesystem. xip2fs executes/reads directly from the
filesystem; no copies.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
