In my view it depends on what you need:

- a few very large disks, go for FCP
FCP luns can't be suballocated (as far as I know), so wanting a lot of
small ones won't give you any fun with the storage admin.

- lots of small disks, go for old style ECKD
LVMing lots of ECKD disks to get a large allocation is cumbersome. But
it is no pain to get a lot of them. That's what the S390 boys have been
doing for ages.


Best regards,
Pieter Harder

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel  +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537

>>> "Lionel B. Dyck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/26/07 6:09  >>>
I've heard several good reasons to have my zlinux images use dasd that
is 
on the fibre connected san and a few for using the old tried and true 
dasd. What I'd like to find out is what is true and what isn't -
basically 
what is considered the best practice for zlinux dasd.

Thus - what do y'all think?

Thanks in advance.

Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist zLinux Platform 
Client and Platform Engineering Services (CAPES) 
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Manager Toni Nicotera 
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
Kaiser Service Credo: "Our cause is health. Our passion is service.
We’re 
here to make lives better.” 

“Never attribute to malice what can be caused by miscommunication.”


NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, 
you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or
disclosing 
its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
the 
sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail
and 
any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.

Brabant Water N.V.
Postbus 1068
5200 BC  's-Hertogenbosch
http://www.brabantwater.nl
Handelsregister: 16005077

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to