Brad Hinson wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 16:03 +0900, John Summerfield wrote:
You caught me. I agree, it is much better to patch it correctly. But at ~2500 lines, the bacula spec file is a beast to edit, and I thought that would scare off any newcomers to rpmbuild. :)
Probably. I'm not familiar with Bacula's spec, but the RHL kernel's spec was "fairly significant" in the time of RHL 7.x-9. There was more kernel in the patches than in the tarball. If the Bacula spec is that convoluted, then changing the tarball it patches could be quite interesting. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 You cannot reply off-list:-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
