Ah, unless it is the monitoring tool which imbeds itself ... We may have a winner here (or loser as the case may be).
Marcy "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Post Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:42 PM To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Low address protection >>> On 3/11/2010 at 06:14 PM, Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> >>> wrote: > Bad bad bad. > > So would you blame the j2ee app or IBM Websphere and it's java? Or is there > not enough to tell here? I would say it has to be the Java implementation, unless Java application programmers are in-lining assembler code now. Mark Post ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
